<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doing Research: Internet and Changes in Ethics of Research (and Human Subjects)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ekarine.org/2009/06/ethicshs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ekarine.org/2009/06/ethicshs/</link>
	<description>A little bit about information and society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:47:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Ess</title>
		<link>http://ekarine.org/2009/06/ethicshs/comment-page-1/#comment-3433</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Ess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekarine.org/?p=588#comment-3433</guid>
		<description>One of my own criticisms of this kind of talk is that in attempting to discern &quot;big picture&quot; patterns of the sort under scrutiny here, one necessarily risks painting with too broad a brush and missing/ignoring too many fine-grained details. 
One of my interests in posting this sort of account, then, is precisely to evoke &quot;yes, but&quot; sorts of responses, i.e., ones that point to countervailing examples, patterns, etc., that would help correct and/or round out the large picture presented here.
In short - criticisms (of these and/or any other sorts) welcome!
- c.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my own criticisms of this kind of talk is that in attempting to discern "big picture" patterns of the sort under scrutiny here, one necessarily risks painting with too broad a brush and missing/ignoring too many fine-grained details.<br />
One of my interests in posting this sort of account, then, is precisely to evoke "yes, but" sorts of responses, i.e., ones that point to countervailing examples, patterns, etc., that would help correct and/or round out the large picture presented here.<br />
In short - criticisms (of these and/or any other sorts) welcome!<br />
- c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

