<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eKarine.org - Information and Society &#187; Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ekarine.org/tag/power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ekarine.org</link>
	<description>A little bit about information and society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:01:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Network Theory</title>
		<link>http://ekarine.org/2011/04/network-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://ekarine.org/2011/04/network-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karine Nahon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Gatekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekarine.org/?p=924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 2010 a bunch of network scholars (including me) convened in a workshop in USC (the Annenberg School) to talk about Network Theory. The strength of the workshop was in its ability to bring interdisciplinary perspectives about network theory to one table. The videos, powerpoints and reports of each one of the talks is available on the ANN (Annenberg Networks Network) website.

As a result, the IJoC (International Journal of Communication) dedicated a volume to network theory.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On February 2010 a bunch of network scholars (including me) convened in a workshop in USC (the Annenberg School) to talk about Network Theory. The strength of the workshop was in its ability to bring interdisciplinary perspectives about network theory to one table. The videos, powerpoints and reports of each one of the talks are available on the <a href="http://ascnetworksnetwork.org/ann-conference">ANN (Annenberg Networks Network) website</a>.</p>
<p>As a result, the <a href="http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc">IJoC (International Journal of Communication)</a> dedicated a volume to network theory.</p>
<p>Here are the papers presented in that volume (they are fully accessible in the following links):</p>
<p><a href="http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1103/554">Prologue to the Special Section: Network Multidimensionality in the Digital Age</a><em> by Manuel Castells, Peter Monge, Noshir Contractor </em></p>
<p><a href="http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1104/555">Introduction to the Workshop: The Promise of Network Theory</a><em> by Manuel Castells </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><a href="http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1136/553">A Network Theory of Power</a><em> by Manuel Castells</em></p>
<p><a href="http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1119/552">Fuzziness of Inclusion/Exclusion in Networks</a><em> by Karine Nahon</em></p>
<p><a href="http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1093/551">Networks of Power, Degrees of Freedom</a><em> by Yochai Benkler</em></p>
<p><a href="http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1131/550">Multidimensional Networks and the Dynamics of Sociomateriality: Bringing Technology Inside the Network</a><em> by Noshir Contractor, Peter Monge, Paul M. Leonardi</em></p>
<p><a href="http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/873/549">The Flip Side of Metcalfe’s Law: Multiple and Growing Costs of Network Exclusion</a><em> by Rahul Tongia, Ernest J. Wilson III</em></p>
<p><a href="http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1120/548">The Ever Evolving Web: The Power of Networks</a><em> by Wendy Hall</em></p>
<p><a href="http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1094/558">Networks, Societies, Spheres: Reflections of an Actor-network Theorist</a><em> by Bruno Latour</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ekarine.org/2011/04/network-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogosphere and Journalists</title>
		<link>http://ekarine.org/2011/01/wallsten/</link>
		<comments>http://ekarine.org/2011/01/wallsten/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karine Nahon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekarine.org/?p=846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post covers the paper that Kevin Wallsten is presenting at HICSS at the e-government minitrack. Kevin is trying to assess the relationship between the blogosphere and journalists. He looked at the A-list blogs by combining two main authority indices of blogs - Karpf's BAI index and The Truth Laid Bear. His findings: Since 2004 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post covers the <a href="http://ekarine.org/wp-admin/docs/BlogsAsMediaSources-HICSS-draft3.pdf" target="_blank">paper </a>that Kevin Wallsten is presenting at <a href="http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu/" target="_blank">HICSS </a>at the e-government minitrack.</p>
<p>Kevin is trying to assess the relationship between the blogosphere and journalists.<br />
He looked at the A-list blogs by combining two main authority indices of blogs - <a href="http://www.blogosphereauthorityindex.com/">Karpf's BAI index</a> and <a href="http://truthlaidbear.com/">The Truth Laid Bear</a>.</p>
<p>His findings: Since 2004 until 2008 there is a steady increase of the coverage of popular political blogs in print media. He also reports on a similar phenomenon that we encountered in the <a href="http://retroV.org" target="_blank">retroV project</a> - a power-law distribution (a skewed distribution) of citations of blogs. In other words, most of the articles in printed newspapers cite a small number of blogs - mainly Huffington post and DailyKos - Wallsten claims for a 80-20 distribution.<br />
His results show that most journalist quote/or cite information from blogs and that one of the main topics in which journalist turn to bloggers to seek information is in election time on topics related to the election. Finally, he showed that liberal blogs are far likely to be cited than conservative blogs. (<a href="http://www.tcd.ie/Statistics/staff/frankbannister.shtml" target="_blank">Frank Bannister</a> raised an important question of whether liberal are cited more because the examined journals were more liberals in their nature).</p>
<div id="__ss_6460648" style="width: 425px;"><strong style="display: block; margin: 12px 0 4px;"><a title="Blogs asmediasources hicss-presentation2010" href="http://www.slideshare.net/karineb/blogs-asmediasources-hicsspresentation2010">Blogs asmediasources hicss-presentation2010</a></strong><object id="__sse6460648" width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=blogsasmediasources-hicsspresentation2010-110105132417-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=blogs-asmediasources-hicsspresentation2010&amp;userName=karineb" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=blogsasmediasources-hicsspresentation2010-110105132417-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=blogs-asmediasources-hicsspresentation2010&amp;userName=karineb" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" name="__sse6460648"></embed></object></div>
<p><script src="http://b.scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js?c1=7&amp;c2=7400849&amp;c3=1&amp;c4=&amp;c5=&amp;c6="></script><br />
 <script src="http://b.scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js?c1=7&amp;c2=7400849&amp;c3=1&amp;c4=&amp;c5=&amp;c6="></script></p>
<p><script src="http://b.scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js?c1=7&amp;c2=7400849&amp;c3=1&amp;c4=&amp;c5=&amp;c6="></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ekarine.org/2011/01/wallsten/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Network Gatekeeping Theory &#8211; what is it? how can researchers use it?</title>
		<link>http://ekarine.org/2008/12/ngt/</link>
		<comments>http://ekarine.org/2008/12/ngt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karine Nahon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatekeeping/Information Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netowork Gatekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Users]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ekarine.org/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gatekeeping theories have been a popular heuristic for describing information control for years, but none have attained a full theoretical status in the context of networks. Network Gatekeeping Theory defines basic concepts like gatekeepers, gatekeeping and gatekeeping mechanisms and gated. It helps understanding relationships among gatekeepers and between gatekeepers and gated, the entity subjected to a gatekeeping [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter" style="text-align: left;">Gatekeeping theories have been a popular heuristic for describing information control for years, but none have attained a full theoretical status in the context of networks. Network Gatekeeping Theory defines basic concepts like gatekeepers, gatekeeping and gatekeeping mechanisms and gated. It helps understanding relationships among gatekeepers and between gatekeepers and gated, the entity subjected to a gatekeeping process.  Network Gatekeeping Salience proposes identifying gated and their salience to gatekeepers by four attributes (1) their political power in relation to the gatekeeper; (2) their information production ability; (3) their relationship with the gatekeeper; and (4) their alternatives in the context of gatekeeping.</div>
<p style="text-align: left;">In a web 2.0 world the relationship of gatekeepers-gated is intriguing. The users ability to produce information and the dynamic relationship between users and gatekeepers makes NGT (Network Gatekeeping Theory) a great framework to analyze these chages.</p>
<p>An elaborated article about Network Gatekeeping Theory can be found here: Barzilai-Nahon Karine, 2008, “<a href="http://ekarine.org/wp-admin/pub/GatekeepingSalienceTheory.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3399cc;">Toward a Theory of Network Gatekeeping: A Framework for Exploring Information Control</span></a>“, Journal of the American Information Science and Technology, Vol. 59(9), pp. 1-20.</p>
<div id="attachment_235" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://ekarine.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/ngt.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-235 " title="NGT-CloudTag" src="http://ekarine.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/ngt.jpg" alt="Network Gatekeeping Theory. This was created by the help of http://www.wordle.net " width="500" height="232" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">This was created by the help of http://www.wordle.net </p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ekarine.org/2008/12/ngt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

